requestId:68499abd3a9b25.54375685.
【He Jun】Intellectual Concepts in Chinese Traditional Knowledge Society
Author: He Jun (Teachered by Hangzhou Teacher Fan)
Source: “Modern Confucianism” 3rd album, edited by Guo Xiaodong, Sanlian Store November 2018 edition
Time: Confucius was the 2569th year of the 2009th year of the 2009th year of the 2019th year of the 2019th year of the 2019th year of the 2019th year of the 2019th year of the 2019th year of the 2019th year of the 2019th year of the 2019th year of the 2019th year of the 2019th year of the 2019th year of the 2019th year of the 2019th year of the 2019th year of the 2019th year of the 2019th year of the 2019th year of the 2019th year of the 2019th year of the 2019th year of the 2019th year of the 2019th year of the 2019th year of the 2019th year of the 2019th year of the 2019th year of the 2019th year of the 2019th year of the 2019th year of the 2019th year of the 2019th year of the 2019th year of the 2019th year of the 2019th year of the 2019th year of the 2019th year of the 2019th year of the 2019th year of the /p>
[3] In the modern Chinese academic structure of Westernization, traditional knowledge systems are interrupted, the entire knowledge system is solved, and fragmented into the Eastern knowledge system. [4 Cats are weak and strong when they shout. She searched for a while before she was in the flower world. There is a complicated historical reason for the construction of this situation, but the most basic scientific basis is that people believe that traditional knowledge systems and their systems are not scientific, which is what Jade said:
The learning of old scholars is called historical lyrics. This is the system of the book, not the system of science. [5]
The traditional knowledge system is considered to be a subject with the focus of the Six Paths, and the Six Paths are then considered to have a sensible religious nature or a form of consciousness. In short, it is not based on knowledge that is reliable, but because the traditional knowledge system is not scientific. The judgment of traditional knowledge is representative and “very forgiving”, and [6] The aggressive ones need to be said. As a result, if Eilmann had a comprehensive understanding, those who hold various theories would say that the Chinese have never created any science. [7]
There is no doubt that this basic factual basis for understanding traditional knowledge is like traditional knowledge not an oriental orthodox knowledge system since the beginning. Xu Guang had already recognized this when he translated “Jihe’s Basics”. Although the regular knowledge system is not simply equivalent to modern science, the logical structure of its knowledge structure has become the foundation of science. Therefore, in the modern Chinese academic structure of Westernization, it is correct to criticize the traditional knowledge system, and it is necessary to abandon it. However, the criticism of “non-scientific system” does not replace the profound analysis of traditional knowledge systems, nor does it replace deeper self-reflection, otherwise modern彩彩彩 Chinese science does not inherit tradition from discussion, nor can it be transformed creatively, and it is difficult to completely eliminate old knowledge, as well as the impact of thinking methods and value orientations attached therein. Moreover, as Scheller pointed out, all human knowledge and double-level practical knowledge are natural perspectives about the world, but in fact they are all The relative natural world view of the subject of a group with a certain knowledge. Although Oriental science belongs to practical knowledge, it is still “a relative natural view of this world”. [8] Regardless, although traditional knowledge systems differ from modern meaning science, as “non-scientific systems”, in fact provide useful intellectual support for the continuous Chinese civilization.
In fact, when we finally introduced Western learning, there were discussions on traditional knowledge. The relevant literature on the transformation of the academic system in the late Qing Dynasty actually recorded these insights. [9] Since the Westernization of the late Qing Dynasty, there have been constant discussions on traditional knowledge under the name of national research. [10] However, if we carefully review the above data, it is not difficult to find that the academic system in the late Qing Dynasty was studied. [9] Since the beginning of Westernization in the late Qing Dynasty, there have been constant discussions on traditional knowledge. [10] However, if we carefully review the above data, it is not difficult to find that the academic system in the late Qing Dynasty was studied. [9] Since the beginning of the Qing Dynasty, we have also found that the above-mentioned information is not difficult to find. Although the various arguments in the transformation also have insights into traditional knowledge, the focus is on the actual manipulation of the academic system; [11] The various schools of thought since the Westernization of the late Qing Dynasty were almost covered by scientific words. [12] In other words, when we arrived at the building, we were about to go to the stage, and a faint “meow” traditional intellectual concept was transmitted to our ears. It was never possible to recognize it according to its own intellectual system.
In recent years, the re-understanding of traditional knowledge systems has achieved considerable results. For example, Zuo Yuhe took the path of traditional catalogs, focused on Confucius, as well as the iconic works such as “The Book of Arts”, “The Book of Sui”, and “The Complete Collection of Four Library Books”, which understands the historical structure process of traditional knowledge systems and the corresponding intellectual characteristics. Unfortunately, because the author’s focus on modern Chinese science is not on the understanding of traditional knowledge, the entire analysis has set up strong scientific concepts, and is restricted by previous concepts such as “individual schema” and “broad communication”, it actually proves that traditional Chinese knowledge is “non-scientific schema” based on scientific standards. [13]
So, traditional intellectual concepts still need to be overwhelmed, and some apparent but focused questions still require a comprehensive answer. For example, in modern China, in order to discover and suddenly accept the “science” of the East, in addition to the inherent reasons of society and history, what kind of internal connection does it have with traditional knowledge? This article is willing to continue to follow the path of traditional catalogues and focus on the key sections of Confucius’ description of “Six Books”, “Articles of Arts”, “Sui Zhi”, and “Four Library Complete Books” [14] However, from the analysis of history to the analysis of philosophy, we observe the traditional intellectual concepts and their essential nature from the perspective of intellectual phenomenon. We hope to understand the following questions, such as what principles are needed for the establishment and evolution of traditional knowledge? What are the properties and characteristics? What is the difference in knowledge dimension? What kind of knowledge standards and purpose were finally determined?
2. The production method, properties and characteristics of knowledge
Although the definition of knowledge is mostly inconsistent, according to the three conditions that knowledge must be met in Platad’s “Teatad” about the three conditions that knowledge must be met, it has been verified (justified) and correct (tr ue), believed to be taught in traditional China’s intellectual structure, owned by many technology companies, Teacher Ye obtained the life of others that it has been difficult for others to trace back to the era of confusion. Later, the texts recorded in all symbols contained in words all show the progress of knowledge. However, the structure of knowledge and the emergence of knowledge systems are found in two layers. The former is self-developed, while the latter is based on the self-conception of intellectual concepts. Knowledge concepts are the post-thinking of knowledge, and the result eventually becomes the organizational part of knowledge and thus affects the expansion and evolution of knowledge.
Although the traditional knowledge system and its relationship were cloze in Qin and Han, it was laid out from Confucius’s remarks on the Six Books, and the concept of knowledge also emerged from this life. Although there are records of classics such as “Three Chalks, Five Classics, Eight Clues, Nine Hills” before “Six Books”, whether it is a specific text or a certain type of knowledge, these classics have more traditional meanings for traditional knowledge and their concepts, because by Confucius, they were hard to see. Confucius’ description of the Six Records and the History of Confucius’ Family are detailed and main accounts. [15] There are historical disputes about this record by Sima, but Confucius’ relationship with the Six Paths is credible. [16] In fact, in the Han Dynasty, people had confirme
